Gender and the h index in psychology

2015/09/23 by Lisa Geraci, Steve Balsis, Alexander Busch +1 · 1 voice
Decision Sciences · #scientometrics and bibliometrics research

paper · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1757-5

crossref issued 2015/09/23 · crossref published 2015/09/23 · crossref published-online 2015/09/23 · openalex publication_date 2015/09/23 · crossref created 2015/09/23 · crossref published-print 2015/12/01 · crossref deposited 2019/06/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref indexed 2026/07/01 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29

Citations

• The role of gender in scholarly authorship
• The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s

Discussions

• h-index is niet gek, maar wel gender-biased (o.a. omdat mannen meer zelf-citeren en man-citeren): http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1757-5 Je bewust zijn van zoiets lijkt me vrij belangrijk voor ieman [bsky, 0 points, 1 comments]