Complementarity of dockless mircomobility and rail transit

2022/07/01 by Justin Tyndall · 1 voice
Engineering · Social Sciences · #Transportation and Mobility Innovations #Urban Transport and Accessibility #Urban and Freight Transport Logistics

paper · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103411

crossref issued 2022/07/01 · crossref published 2022/07/01 · crossref published-print 2022/07/01 · openalex publication_date 2022/07/01 · crossref created 2022/08/08 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref deposited 2025/10/18 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/11 · crossref indexed 2026/06/15

Citations

• Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?
• Economic regulation and E-scooter networks in the USA
• Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors
• The impacts of shared e-scooters on bus ridership
• Cycling mode choice amongst US commuters: The role of climate and topography

Discussions

• In Seattle, a new rail station "significantly" increased the use of shared bikes and scooters within a five-minute walking radius of the station. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103411 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]