vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

The Coupled Location/Depth/Yield Problem for North Korea’s Declared Nuclear Tests

2018/08/08 by M. E. Pasyanos, Stephen C. Myers · 1 voice
Earth and Planetary Sciences · Materials Science · #earthquake and tectonic studies #High-pressure geophysics and materials #Nuclear Materials and Properties

paper · doi:10.1785/0220180109

openalex publication_date 2018/08/08 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31

Abstract

On 3 September 2017, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) conducted its sixth and largest declared nuclear test at the Pung'gye Ri test site. Recently, we have been using regional waveform envelopes to estimate the explosive yield and overburden of chemical and nuclear explosions by coupling explosion source models to propagation parameters. Like most yield determination methods, there can be tradeoffs between yield and depth, leading to uncertainties in both parameters. The relative locations are well-constrained by small timing differences in seismic-phase arrivals at stations that recorded multiple events, but there are potential uncertainties on the absolute locations. Depths are poorly constrained by the relative arrival times. In this study, we have performed a coupled location and yield analysis of the DPRK nuclear tests. We use correlation methods to get highly accurate travel times and relative locations using a Bayesian location method. Then, while keeping the relative locations of the six tests constant, we consider the consequences of shifts to the absolute locations on the resulting overburden for each event. Given that overburden, we determine the yield that minimizes the waveform misfit. We also test and compare a number of explosion source models. By considering the coupled location/depth/yield problem, we reduce uncertainties in the absolute locations, and yield and depth estimates of the events. Based on statistical analysis, we estimate that the 2017 test has a yield of 125 kilotons (equivalent TNT) with a 1 sigma uncertainty range of 103-150 ktons at about 600 m of overburden.

Discussions

Related