Psychiatry's stance towards scientifically implausible therapies: are we losing ground?

2019/07/17 by Gerald M. Rosen, Gerald M Rosen, Scott O. Lilienfeld +3 · 1 voice · 1 citation
Arts and Humanities · Medicine · Neuroscience · #Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies #Mental Health and Psychiatry #Neurology and Historical Studies

paper · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30276-7

openalex publication_date 2019/07/17 · crossref created 2019/07/17 · crossref issued 2019/10/01 · crossref published 2019/10/01 · crossref published-print 2019/10/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref deposited 2025/11/06 · crossref indexed 2025/11/06 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29

Citations

• Is Tapping on Acupuncture Points an Active Ingredient in Emotional Freedom Techniques? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

Cited by

• Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism [wikipedia]

Discussions

• This comment in Lancet Psychiatry basically argues for psychiatric interventions to be "scientable": their working mechanisms need to be plausible before RCTs can bei conducted. https://doi.org/10.101 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]