2016/11/28 by Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo +1 · 1 voice · 2 citations
Computer Science · Decision Sciences · Medicine · #Health and Medical Research Impacts #cs.DL #scientometrics and bibliometrics research
paper · pdf · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2193-x
published as Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.A., Soldatenkova, A. (2017). How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy. Scientometrics, 110(2), 867-877
crossref issued 2016/11/28 · crossref published 2016/11/28 · crossref published-online 2016/11/28 · openalex publication_date 2016/11/28 · crossref created 2016/11/28 · openalex created_date 2016/12/08 · crossref published-print 2017/02/01 · crossref deposited 2017/06/25 · arxiv created 2018/10/30 · arxiv updated 2018/10/31 · crossref indexed 2025/12/31 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
We investigate the question of how long top scientists retain their stardom. We observe the research performance of all Italian professors in the sciences over three consecutive four-year periods, between 2001 and 2012. The top scientists of the first period are identified on the basis of research productivity, and their performance is then tracked through time. The analyses demonstrate that more than a third of the nation's top scientists maintain this status over the three consecutive periods, with higher shares occurring in the life sciences and lower ones in engineering. Compared to males, females are less likely to maintain top status. There are also regional differences, among which top status is less likely to survive in southern Italy than in the north. Finally we investigate the longevity of unproductive professors, and then check whether the career progress of the top and unproductive scientists is aligned with their respective performances. The results appear to have implications for national policies on academic recruitment and advancement.