2020/11/29 by Fatih Çağatay Cengiz · 1 voice · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Turkey's Politics and Society #Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies #Populism, Right-Wing Movements
paper · doi:10.1080/14683849.2020.1850283
openalex publication_date 2020/11/29 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2025/11/06
While much has been written to explain the mutation of Islamic-oriented parties in Turkey from pursuing an Islamic ideological cause to embracing vote-seeking behavior and democratic processes, little effort has been made to explain why the far-right establishment – represented by the Nationalist Action Party (Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi, MHP) – still resists ideological change. This article argues that fortification of nationalism with Islam in the party, the party’s identification with Turkey’s national security issues, and the construction of personality cult around party founder Alparslan Türkeş restrict its ideological moderation. Nevertheless, the party benefits from this ideological immoderation to be a key player in Turkish politics. In other words, while ideological immoderation prevents the MHP from embracing a pluralistic political stance, it has also been functional to exert its nationalist ideology on the state without sharing governmental power.