2018/01/14 by Maria Guagnin, Ceri Shipton, Sarah el‐Dossary +6 · 2 citations
Agricultural and Biological Sciences · Environmental Science · Social Sciences · #Animal Diversity and Health Studies #Wildlife Ecology and Conservation #Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
paper · doi:10.1111/jbi.13165
openalex publication_date 2018/01/14 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
Abstract Aim Our knowledge of the prehistoric distribution of animal species is so far largely dependent on the location of excavated archaeological and palaeontological sites. In the absence of excavated faunal remains, many species that were present in the Levant and North Africa have been assumed to have been absent on the Arabian Peninsula. Here, we explore representations of four species that were identifiable in the rock art, but had not previously been reported in north‐western Arabia. Location Jubbah and Shuwaymis UNESCO world heritage rock art sites in Ha'il province, north‐western Saudi Arabia. Methods In total, the rock art panels surveyed and recorded in Jubbah and Shuwaymis contain 6,618 individual animal depictions. Species were identified based on diagnostic features of the anatomy. The resulting dataset was then compared to the faunal spectrum reported in the (archaeo)zoological literature. Results The rock art dataset provides evidence that the distributions of lesser kudu ( Tragelaphus imberbis ), wild camel and African wild ass ( Equus africanus ) extended into the north‐west of Arabia and that the engravers may have had knowledge of aurochs ( Bos primigenius ). Main conclusions The presence of previously undocumented mammal species in Arabia provides new information regarding their distribution, as well as the types of habitat and vegetation that were available in prehistoric landscapes. Moreover, the presence of kudu on the Arabian Peninsula indicates that the identification of palaeo‐distributions based exclusively on faunal remains may miss key species in the Afro‐Eurasian faunal exchange.