2022/10/24 by Tim Bunnell, Maitrii Aung-Thwin, Jessica N Clendenning +2 · 1 voice · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Socioeconomic Development in Asia #Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies #Urban Planning and Governance
paper · doi:10.1177/02637758221133832
openalex publication_date 2022/10/24 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/18
Geographers and historians have contributed to a well-established literature on how places become repositories of inherited meanings and contested memories. Much less attention has been afforded to space and place as future-making resources. In this article, we consider how extant places feature in the imagination, planning and development of ex novo cities. Focusing on three new administrative capitals in Southeast Asia – Putrajaya (in Malaysia), Naypyidaw (in Myanmar) and Nusantara (in Indonesia) – we show how places have been mobilized as points of persuasion, or what sociologist Thomas Gieryn has termed “truth spots”. Drawing and building upon Gieryn’s work, we identify three heuristic types of truth spots: aspirational truth spots that demonstrate progressive developmental possibilities for emulation; antithetical truth spots signaling past failures to avoid in planning and developing the future city; and anticipatory truth spots that articulate future expectations, justifying forms of (in)action in the present. While existing work on truth spots emphasizes powers of persuasion associated with physical, in-person experiences of place, our emphasis and contribution centres on the narrative mobilization of place references.