2003/08/01 by Andy Hines · 14 citations
Earth and Planetary Sciences · Engineering · Physics and Astronomy · Psychology · #Business #Computer science #Creativity in Education and Neuroscience #Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution #Economics #Engineering #Engineering ethics #Field (mathematics) #Finance #Futures contract #Futures studies #Futurist #Law #Mainstream #Management #Marketing #Political science #Public relations #Salon #Scenario planning #Social science #Sociology #Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life #Task (project management) #Thriving #Value (mathematics)
paper · doi:10.1108/14636680310494735
published in foresight 5(4), 28-35 (Emerald Publishing Limited)
openalex publication_date 2003/08/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
The Association of Professional Futurists (APF) recently held a scenario salon that explored the “Futures of futures.” The centerpiece of the findings was the identification and implications of four critical uncertainties affecting futurists and the futures field. First, is addressing the extremely fragmented nature of the field. Futurists must get better at working together more closely as a field to be successful. Second, is the need to confront our aging tool kit. It is not as if methodological innovation has stopped, but it is seen as largely incremental. Third, is the need for futures to create a unique value proposition that distinguishes futurists from mainstream consultants. Finally, there is the poor public image of the field. This suggests that there is a long‐term task ahead of careful rebuilding the brand of futures through a more sophisticated engagement with the public, especially the media. The APF has formed working teams around these issues. The APF sees a generation task ahead, but is confident that together with our futurist colleagues, we can achieve our goal of a “credible profession, thriving professionals.”