Scientific peer review

2011/01/01 by Lutz Bornmann · 1 voice · 10 citations
Computer Science · Decision Sciences · #Information Retrieval and Search Behavior #Web visibility and informetrics #scientometrics and bibliometrics research

paper · doi:10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112

crossref issued 2011/01/01 · crossref published 2011/01/01 · crossref published-print 2011/01/01 · openalex publication_date 2011/01/01 · crossref published-online 2013/01/02 · crossref created 2013/01/03 · crossref deposited 2025/10/08 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref indexed 2026/07/30 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30

Citations

• Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
• High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes
• Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system
• Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again
• Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives
• Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals
• The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

Cited by

• On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review:\n Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff
• Plots for visualizing paper impact and journal impact of single\n researchers in a single graph
• Author‐suggested reviewers: gender differences and influences on the peer review process at an ecology journal
• The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer\n assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000
• Turning the tables in citation analysis one more time: Principles for\n comparing sets of documents
• The 2023 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for a health-centred response in a world facing irreversible harms
• Intermediacy of publications
• How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia
• The SPR-Index: A Novel Metric Integrating the H-Index with Verified Peer Review Scores
• The 2024 Europe report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: unprecedented warming demands unprecedented action

Discussions

• I agree that the abstract perhaps overstates the scarcity of studies. For example Bornmann's "Scientific peer review" and Lee et al. "Bias in peer review" (both published 2013) provide a good overview [bsky, 0 points, 1 comments]