2024/03/16 by Juan R. Loaiza, Diana Marcela Rojas Velásquez · 1 voice · 1 citation
Neuroscience · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Emotions and Moral Behavior #Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment #Psychology of Social Influence
paper · doi:10.1080/09515089.2024.2331584
openalex publication_date 2024/03/16 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/14
Munch-Jurisic’s account of perpetrator disgust raises important new questions concerning the complexity of emotions and their connection with moral actions. In this commentary, we discuss this account by applying some of the author’s ideas to the case of anger. We suggest that just as the relations between disgust and moral action are much more nuanced than previously thought, as Munch-Jurisic explains, analyses of anger can also profit from a more careful approach to such connections. Specifically, we propose that contextual factors can affect the moral character of anger reactions, which in turn can provide them with moral value. We also argue that the contextual view deployed to study disgust reactions can also support distinctions between core forms and socio-moral forms of the same emotion, which in turn raises interesting questions concerning different forms of anger. Lastly, we extend the contextual approach to problems of emotion individuation and theories in emotion science, showing how current scientific emotion theories can learn from a detailed examination of disgust, anger, and other context-sensitive emotions. We aim to highlight some important contributions of Munch-Jurisic’s work to broader discussions on emotions, morality, and how to theorize about emotions overall.