Suggestions for the Standardized Collection of Reasons for Refusals in Face-to-Face Surveys

2016/12/14 by Natalja Menold, Menold, Natalja, Cornelia Züll +1
Social Sciences · #Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

paper · doi:10.12758/mda.2011.004

openalex publication_date 2016/12/14 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Refusals are a considerable source of non-response in surveys. During the field period, some surveys collect reasons for refusals as survey para-data. In addition to providing information for research these data can also provide information about non-respondents that can be used to reduce refusal rates. However, there is a lack of standardized instruments of data collection, the fact of which declines reliability, validity, and objectivity of the data collected. This article presents a standardized instrument – a categorization scheme – for classifying reasons for refusals. The instrument was developed using content analysis of open-ended comments by interviewers in the German General Social Survey (ALLBUS 2008). The interrater-reliability of the developed categorization scheme is .84 and thus satisfying. We give some suggestions on how the categorization scheme can be used by surveyors as well as by interviewers when collecting reasons for refusals.

Related

• How to Reduce Item Nonresponse in Face- to-Face Surveys? A Review and Evidence from the European Social Survey
• Using Information from Telephone Panel Surveys to Predict Reasons for Refusal
• Respondent Incentives in a National Face-to-Face Survey: Effects on Outcome Rates, Sample Composition and Fieldwork Efforts
• Satisficing Among Reluctant Respondents in a Cross-National Context
• Survey Attitude as Indicator for Survey Climate and as Predictor of Nonresponse and Attrition in a Probability-Based Online Panel