2014/10/02 by Brett C. Burkhardt
Social Sciences · #Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis #Law in Society and Culture #Political Philosophy and Ethics
paper · doi:10.1080/00380237.2014.940264
crossref issued 2014/10/02 · crossref published 2014/10/02 · crossref published-online 2014/10/02 · crossref published-print 2014/10/02 · openalex publication_date 2014/10/02 · crossref created 2014/10/02 · crossref deposited 2024/06/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref indexed 2026/07/30 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
New policies require legitimacy to survive. Prison privatization represents a policy challenged by initial perceptions of illegitimacy. In the 1980s, governments began to allow private firms to run correctional facilities, shifting an inherently coercive, traditionally governmental function—incarceration—to the private sector. With data from 706 articles in four major American newspapers spanning 24 years, this research uses Freudenburg and Alario’s concept of diversionary reframing to measure and track the moral legitimacy of prison privatization across time and place. Findings suggest that initially high levels of moral legitimacy facilitated some states’ adoption of private prisons, while initially low levels of moral legitimacy stunted the growth of privatization in other states. This study presents a novel way of measuring moral legitimacy, demonstrates how the concept may be used to help explain controversial public policy changes, and documents the cultural content of private prison debates in the United States.