Two Tales of Polarization? How Affective and Ideological Polarization Influence Political Corruption—A Panel Analysis of 153 Countries Between 2000 and 2021

2025/03/18 by Áron Hajnal · 1 voice · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Gender Politics and Representation #Populism, Right-Wing Movements

paper · pdf · doi:10.1177/00323217251324306

openalex publication_date 2025/03/18 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increased scholarly interest in citizen (or mass) polarization and its associated socioeconomic and political consequences. Although substantial evidence supports that citizen polarization affects political (or grand) corruption through a variety of mechanisms, research remains fragmented and contradictory about the precise nature of these mechanisms. This article posits that two broad and relatively distinct types of citizen polarization—affective and ideological polarization—yield differing effects on political corruption. It was hypothesized that (1) moderate levels of affective polarization have minimal effects, whereas higher levels increase political corruption; and that (2) moderate levels of ideological polarization decrease corruption, while excessive ideological polarization leads to increased political corruption. Both hypotheses were validated through panel regressions on a sample of 153 countries with data from 2000 to 2021. The article also investigates the moderating effect of regime type.

Citations

• How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization
• Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?
• The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion
• Is Polarization a Myth?
• Affect, Not Ideology
• Mass Polarization: Manifestations and Measurements
• Constraining Governments: New Indices of Vertical, Horizontal, and Diagonal Accountability
• Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities
• The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
• Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies
• Democratic regression in comparative perspective: scope, methods, and causes
• How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms
• Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not
• Rational autocrats? Drivers of corruption patterns in competitive authoritarian regimes: towards an explanatory framework with empirical applications from Hungary

Cited by

• Divisions at Home, Broken Promises Abroad? How Domestic Politics Shapes the United States’ Nuclear Credibility

Discussions

• "Two Tales of Polarization? How Affective and Ideological Polarization Influence Political Corruption—A Panel Analysis of 153 Countries Between 2000 and 2021" doi.org/10.1177/0032... [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]

Related

• The (alleged) consequences of affective polarization: A survey experiment in nine democracies
• Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities
• Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not
• Does political polarisation undermine democratic accountability? Evidence from 28 European democracies
• Polarization congruence and satisfaction with democracy: A multinational investigation