2017/09/08 by Kasi Eswarappa · 1 voice · 2 citations
Social Sciences · #Social and Economic Development in India #Income, Poverty, and Inequality #South Asian Studies and Conflicts
paper · doi:10.1177/2455328x17723390
openalex publication_date 2017/09/08 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
The terms ‘livelihoods’, ‘poverty’ and ‘development’ have different meanings in different societies and people. Development implies a better quality of life and enahancement of opportunities, and better access to assets and services to marginal communities: particularly the Adivasis, women and other marginalized communities. Developing its theoretical framework around the existing literature on the issues, this article argues that prevailing factional politics and apathy on the part of the governing agency are preventing the marginalized groups from adequately benefitting from the developmental interventions. Keeping in view the aforementioned argument, an empirical study was conducted in a tribal settlement in South India in order to understand the implications of different developmental interventions initiated both by the state and NGOs to improve the lives and livelihoods of marginalized groups. On the basis of this argument, this article has sought to raise policy questions pertinent to both the policymakers and practitioners on the efficacy of policies related to vulnerable groups.