2014/04/01 by Dennis Ott
Arts and Humanities · Computer Science · #Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies #Natural Language Processing Techniques #Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
paper · doi:10.1162/ling_a_00155
crossref issued 2014/04/01 · crossref published 2014/04/01 · crossref published-print 2014/04/01 · openalex publication_date 2014/04/01 · crossref created 2014/04/28 · crossref deposited 2024/05/26 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/20 · crossref indexed 2026/07/29
This article proposes a novel analysis of contrastive left-dislocation (CLD), according to which the left-dislocated XP is a remnant of clausal ellipsis. This analysis makes sense of the otherwise paradoxical fact that the dislocated XP shows connectivity into the clause it precedes, while other properties betray its clause-external status. The paradox is resolved by analyzing CLD as a juxtaposition of two parallel clauses, the first of which is reduced by deletion at PF. Akin to recent treatments of sluicing, fragment answers, split questions, and other phenomena, the analysis reduces CLD to an interplay of Ā-movement and ellipsis, thereby removing constructional residue from the theory of Universal Grammar.