2025/04/29 by Rocío Egoávil-Espejo, Barbara Ymaña, Rosario Oporto-Llerena +15 · 1 voice
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Immunology and Microbiology · Medicine · #Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria #Antibiotic Use and Resistance #Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
paper · pdf · doi:10.1093/jacamr/dlaf082
openalex publication_date 2025/04/29 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
Abstract Objectives To determine the activity of cefiderocol against 101 Peruvian Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Methods Carbapenem– and/or third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin–resistant P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were isolated in nine Peruvian health centres. Antibiotic susceptibility was established by automated methods and/or disc diffusion (10 antimicrobial agents), colistin agar test (colistin) and microdilution (cefiderocol). The presence of blaPER, blaCTX-M, blaGES, blaKPC, blaIMI, blaIMP, blaNDM, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-24, blaOXA-48, blaOXA-58, blaVIM and oprD was established by PCR; blaCTX-M and oprD were sequenced. The levels of antimicrobial resistance ranged from 20.8% (colistin) to 97.0% (meropenem). Results The MIC of cefiderocol ranged from ≤ 0.06 to 8 mg/L (one isolate). Cefiderocol resistance rates were 1.0% (according to the FDA and EUCAST) and 0% according to CLSI, whereas 14.9% and 1.0% of isolates were classified as cefiderocol-intermediate according to FDA and CLSI, respectively. CTX-M-131 and GES, and IMP and VIM were the most frequent ESBLs and carbapenemases, respectively. The presence of oprD mutations was tested in 47 carbapenem-resistant isolates, 23 with oprD-inactivating mutations as the sole underlying mechanism. Although no specific association was found between the presence of ESBLs and carbapenemases with cefiderocol resistance, carbapenemase-producing isolates tended to present slightly higher cefiderocol MIC values. The cefiderocol-resistant isolate did not present ESBLs or carbapenemases, showing only an oprD-inactivating mutation. Conclusions Cefiderocol showed excellent activity against P. aeruginosa, irrespective of the presence of ESBLs and/or carbapenemases. The high number of isolates bordering cefiderocol-resistant levels suggests the need for cautious use and continuous surveillance of this antibiotic.