2025/06/02 by Jonas Eliasson · 1 voice · 1 citation
Business, Management and Accounting · Decision Sciences · Engineering · #Construction Project Management and Performance #Public-Private Partnership Projects #Underground infrastructure and sustainability
paper · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2025.104532
openalex publication_date 2025/06/02 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/25
This paper analyses the accuracy of cost estimates for Swedish transport infrastructure projects 2004–2022, discusses causes of cost overruns, and suggests remedies. Cost estimates for all projects in the national investment plans 2010–2022 are tracked from early planning to completion. Final costs for all projects finished 2004–2022 are compared to decision-to-build cost estimates. Results show considerable cost escalation during the planning stages, on average, while cost estimates at the decision-to-build are close to final costs, on average. Cost escalations during the planning stage are not uniform, however: the distribution of cost changes is highly skewed with a long right tail. The reason that final costs tend to exceed early cost estimates is that project decisions are effectively locked in before projects’ costs and benefits have been thoroughly assessed. Lock-in of premature decisions does not only cause cost overruns; even worse, it distorts project selection and design, reduces incentives to search for more cost-efficient designs, and increases opportunities and incentives for project beneficiaries to underestimate costs and overestimate benefits. Several ways to tackle these problems are suggested.