2025/07/01 by Öner Özçelik · 1 voice
Arts and Humanities · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Linguistic Variation and Morphology #Phonetics and Phonology Research #Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
paper · doi:10.1177/02676583251327888
openalex publication_date 2025/07/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
This article engages with Archibald’s call for greater integration of phonology within generative second language (L2) acquisition research, further exploring the cognitive and theoretical implications of multilingual phonological grammars. Addressing the longstanding imbalance between L2 work in phonology and morphosyntax, it joins Archibald in advocating for deeper consideration of abstract phonological representations and their parallels with syntax. While some of Archibald’s assumptions – such as the recursive nature of phonology and the role of Optimality Theory in its underrepresentation in generative L2 research – invite debate, his broader insights into phonological complexity and interdisciplinary relevance are highly compelling. By critically engaging with these issues, this discussion reinforces the need to bridge phonology and syntax in second language research, while also drawing attention to the distinction between phonetics and phonology and to the role of phonology as part of the grammar and its function within the greater cognitive system.