Performance of clinical decision rules in patients presenting with suspected recurrent venous thromboembolism: a multicenter prospective cohort study

2025/06/25 by Vicky Mai, Emily S.L. Martens, Marc Righini +17 · 1 voice
Medicine · #Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms #Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis #Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

paper · doi:10.1016/j.jtha.2025.06.019

openalex publication_date 2025/06/25 · crossref created 2025/06/25 · crossref issued 2025/10/01 · crossref published 2025/10/01 · crossref published-print 2025/10/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref deposited 2026/05/01 · crossref indexed 2026/07/17 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01

Citations

• Derivation of a Simple Clinical Model to Categorize Patients Probability of Pulmonary Embolism: Increasing the Models Utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer

Discussions

• 2/ 🔍 Key findings: ▪️ Recurrent VTE ruled out without imaging in ~15% of cases (vs >30% in first-time VTE) ▪️ PE suspicion + neg D-dimer = 0/82 recurrent VTE (0%; 95% CI 0.0–4.4) ⚠️ CDRs aren’t fool [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]