Risk and its others: Toward an anthropology of “protection” in rural Mongolia

2024/12/23 by Joseph Bristley · 1 voice
Environmental Science · Social Sciences · #Anthropological Studies and Insights #Geographies of human-animal interactions #Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology

paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/aman.28041

openalex publication_date 2024/12/23 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/25

Abstract

Abstract Anthropological studies of risk have long focused on how people respond to and aim to manage potential harm. But despite its long and important genealogy, this article suggests that risk can pose an analytic blind spot that potentially occludes other ways of understanding how people aim to live well in potentially harmful situations. In doing so, it argues for anthropological attention to a Mongolian “protection” concept: an optimistic idea that imaginatively tethers defense against harm with prospects of living well in the conditions that follow. This approach aims to recast and deepen anthropological understanding of how people conceptualize, deal with, and move beyond harms encountered in everyday life.

Discussions

• Check out Joseph Bristley's "#Risk and its others: Toward an anthropology of 'protection' in rural Mongolia" at [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]

Related

• "How can we refuse the gift of spirits?" Ontological conflicts between indigenous hunting practices and conservation projects in northern Mongolia
• Keeping unsafe at home: disputes and social practices regarding risks during a geological disaster in a vulnerable fishing community in Argentina
• Sharing vulnerabilities: Rethinking privilege and solidarities in anthropology from the perspective of ordinary ethics
• Fear and anthropology: a view from 1995
• Animal History of the Mongolian Plateau