Response to Letter: Uncertainty and risk of misleading conclusions: an umbrella review of the quality of the evi-dence for ankle arthroscopy

2025/09/19 by Ville Ponkilainen, Valtteri J. Panula, Juho Laaksonen +4 · 1 voice
Medicine · Health Professions · #Foot and Ankle Surgery #Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation #Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare

paper · pdf · doi:10.2340/17453674.2025.44795

openalex publication_date 2025/09/19 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01

Abstract

Non peer reviewed

Discussions

• Response to Letter: Uncertainty and risk of misleading conclusions: an umbrella review of the quality of the evi-dence for ankle arthroscopy Ville Ponkilainen, Valtteri Panula, Juho Laaksonen, Anniina [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]

Related

• Uncertainty and risk of misleading conclusions: an umbrella review of the quality of the evidence for ankle arthroscopy
• Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews
• Response to Letter: A 3-mm protrusion threshold after pediatric forearm ESIN: a rule-out safety margin, not a decision rule
• Editorial Commentary : Surgical Decision Making in the Court of Public Opinion for Arthroscopic Versus Open Rotator Cuff Repair
• Author Reply to “Regarding ‘Sling Is Not Inferior to Brace Immobilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial’”