2021/08/13 by Dov Waxman, David Schraub, Adam Hosein · 1 voice · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies #Social and Intergroup Psychology #German legal, social, and political studies
paper · doi:10.1080/01419870.2021.1960407
openalex publication_date 2021/08/13 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/04
Antisemitism has returned as a major issue across the Western world. But while concern about antisemitism is growing, agreement on what constitutes antisemitism is shrinking. Nowadays, charges of antisemitism are hotly disputed, often accompanied by accusations of bad faith, particularly when they concern criticisms of Israel or anti-Zionism. This article contends that one reason why antisemitism has become increasingly contested is because there are different ways of thinking about antisemitism and identifying it. We examine four common and contrasting approaches to identifying antisemitism, highlighting the challenges each presents when it comes to identifying antisemitism in practice. Since these alternative approaches yield different answers about whether something is antisemitic or not, disagreement and debate over allegations of antisemitism is unavoidable. Hence, we conclude by offering suggestions for how antisemitism claims should be addressed in a way that minimizes conflict and promotes greater awareness about the various ways that antisemitism can operate.