2025/08/15 by Andrew J. Luhmann, S. L. Bilek, M. D. Covington +6 · 1 voice
Earth and Planetary Sciences · #Karst Systems and Hydrogeology #Seismic Waves and Analysis #earthquake and tectonic studies
paper · pdf · doi:10.1007/s10040-025-02934-y
openalex publication_date 2025/08/15 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23
Abstract After deploying a seismic network above a karst aquifer that feeds Bear Spring in Minnesota, USA, three injection experiments were conducted, which involved pouring ~10,000 L of water just above an overflow spring to induce and characterize ambient seismic noise from subsurface water flow. A rainstorm event followed the second experiment and caused the overflow spring to start flowing with meters of water level rise, increasing the total spring discharge (perennial and overflow emanations) from ~100 to 300 L/s. Water level, electrical conductivity, and temperature data were used to estimate the conduit hydraulic diameter of ~0.06 m from the second injection experiment and ~0.5 m from the recharge event, which suggested both open channel and full pipe conduit flow. The rainstorm led to the largest seismic signals over a 5 s period while water levels rose, producing ground motion up to ~0.5 mm/s, possible oscillatory behavior, and 1–150 J of radiated seismic energy at frequencies of ~30–50 and 70–90 Hz (similar to signal frequencies when the large water slug from the second injection experiment reached a sump or water-filled passage). The seismic sources originated from multiple directions. The calculations suggest these signals came from conduits with air pockets that were compressed from rising water levels and later released via ventilation pathways. Seismic records of this process enable identification of the change in mode of water level propagation and potential delineation of unknown subsurface pathways, facilitating karst aquifer characterization beyond what is possible with traditional monitoring strategies.