vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Connector blood leakage suggesting pulmonary artery catheter damage

2025/07/01 by Toshimitsu Ishii, Hirotsugu Miyoshi, Hidenori Sato +4 · 1 voice
Medicine · Health Professions · #Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy #Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis #Ultrasound in Clinical Applications

paper · pdf · doi:10.1002/anr3.70022

openalex publication_date 2025/07/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22

Abstract

Catheter entrapment is a rare complication of pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) insertion [1, 2]. A 57-year-old man underwent ascending aortic replacement. A PAC was inserted via the right internal jugular vein without difficulty under continuous transoesophageal echocardiographic guidance, which confirmed its appropriate placement in the right pulmonary artery. As this was his second cardiac surgery, dense adhesions were present. During adhesiolysis, an injury occurred at the base of the pulmonary artery, which was successfully repaired using felt-reinforced sutures. Fresh blood was observed around the optical module connector upon arrival to the intensive care unit, though the significance of this was unknown (Fig. 1A). Pulmonary artery pressures, mixed venous oxygen saturation and cardiac output measurements were unaffected and clinically appropriate. On postoperative day 1, PAC removal was attempted but resistance was encountered after withdrawing approximately 5 cm. Fluoroscopy revealed that the catheter tip was fixed. During resternotomy, we found the PAC had been inadvertently sutured to the pulmonary artery. The catheter was carefully released and removed with cardiac bypass support. Examination revealed suture punctures through the optical module lumen, resulting in blood leakage without affecting monitored values (Fig. 1B and C). The patient recovered without further complications. Blood leakage from the optical module connector may indicate catheter damage or entrapment, even in the absence of abnormal monitoring data, and should prompt further evaluation. We would like to thank Dr M. Tomota, Dr S. Go, Dr T. Hiraoka and Dr M. Kuraoka for their valuable contributions as members of the same clinical team. Their involvement in patient care and support for this case report are gratefully acknowledged. Published with the written consent of the patient. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Discussions

Related