2025/07/17 by Liam Hannah, Eunice Eunhee Jang, Meng‐Hsun Lee +1 · 1 voice · 1 citation
Psychology · #Phonetics and Phonology Research #Reading and Literacy Development #Stuttering Research and Treatment
paper · pdf · doi:10.1177/02655322251348956
openalex publication_date 2025/07/17 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/15
While the automated assessment of oral reading fluency (ORF) using accuracy and speech rate has proliferated, expressiveness of speech, as measured by prosodic features, has been neglected due to its inherent complexity and lack of technological resources. Despite the potential benefits of burgeoning technology for assessing hard-to-measure constructs such as ORF, insensitivity to linguistic diversities threatens valid score interpretations and fair use for all learners. The present study investigated the potential benefits of developing an automated, prosody-inclusive ORF assessment in a post-secondary education setting involving many English language learners (ELLs). The analysis focused on three ways the inclusion of prosody may improve automated ORF assessments: by reducing bias against ELLs, improved prediction of reading comprehension, and improved diagnostic information. Data were analyzed by comparing two different scoring outcomes, the traditional ORF measure and a new prosody-inclusive outcome score, comparing these measures across language background. Results showed that the inclusion of prosody improves automated ORF assessment by reducing discrepancies between ELLs and English first language students caused by automated speech recognition inaccuracies, leads to better prediction of reading comprehension with ELLs, and provides meaningful diagnostic information. Detailed descriptions of the models, their relevance, and implications for the language testing community are discussed.