2021/07/21 by Dan Flory · 1 voice
Neuroscience · Psychology · Arts and Humanities · #Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment #Emotions and Moral Behavior #Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
paper · doi:10.1093/jaac/kpab039
openalex publication_date 2021/07/21 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23
Abstract During the early part of the classic Hollywood sound period (1930–60), filmmakers sharpened a standardized way to portray Native American characters in Westerns. Such figures were depicted as disgusting by virtue of being beyond the pale in terms of their “acceptable” moral behavior, as measured by common white sensibilities of the era. This behavior was attributed to their nonwhiteness and therefore presumptively stemmed from their allegedly subhuman, “savage” nature. This stock depiction of Native American characters became one of creatures who communicated by means of silence, war whoops, animal sounds, or unintelligible language, and committed grievous moral transgressions without qualm. In this article I analyze the theoretical structure of such depictions and how these depictions work in terms of typical audience reaction, using recent work in philosophy of film, philosophy of emotion, and cognitive film theory.