Cover crops, chemicals, and emissions in Pottawatomie County, Kansas, USA

2026/02/04 by Jacob Miller-Klugesherz · 1 voice
Environmental Science · Agricultural and Biological Sciences · #Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics #Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics #Soil erosion and sediment transport

paper · pdf · doi:10.5304/jafscd.2026.152.002

openalex publication_date 2026/02/04 · openalex created_date 2026/02/06 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21

Abstract

Cover crops have numerous benefits, including enhanced erosion control, forage biomass, nitrogen fixation, nutrient recycling, weed suppression, water management, temperature moderation, and carbon sequestration. Still, the adoption of cover crops by farmers is significantly influenced by their individual goals and preferences, their specific agroecological contexts, and larger agro-industrial structures and systems. Farmers in Pottawatomie County, Kansas, planted cover crops on 8.2% of the county’s cropland in 2022 (nearly twice the national average). This study sought to understand what these farmers were looking for in cover crops by specifically choosing to interview them. Utiliz­ing information gleaned from inter­views with 22 farmers and/or cover crop experts, I was able to thematically analyze the resulting data. Coding revealed that many interviewees were on the “chemical herbicide treadmill” for cover crop suppression and/or termination. I used this infor­mation as a theoretical framework to inform descriptive analyses of farm characteristics, crop types, farmland use, and emissions. After compar­ing trends and themes, I found that interviewees looked for cover crops to be affordable if not prof­itable, suitable for use as a supplement forage biomass/nutrition for cattle, and ideally subsidized by cost-share programs (~US50/acre). Weather and labor availability and labor cost were also key influ­ences. When grazing or crimping cover crops was not an option for their suppression or termination, interviewees preferred using herbicides over mini­mum tillage. This preference was reflected in the 1997–2022 county-level trends of increased herbi­cide application rates and expenses, notable changes in the primary cropland type from hay(lage) to corn and soybeans, and accelerated leaching emissions. Finally, I discussed implications for adopting soil health principles that trended more organic than regenerative, and offered resources for cover crop education, outreach, and cost share.

Citations

• Using thematic analysis in psychology
• Seeing Through the ‘Good Farmer's’ Eyes: Towards Developing an Understanding of the Social Symbolic Value of ‘Productivist’ Behaviour
• Do cover crops increase or decrease nitrous oxide emissions? A meta-analysis
• Race to the Bottom (of the Well): Groundwater in an Agricultural Production Treadmill
• Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples
• A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis
• The Treadmill Revisited
• Summary for Policymakers
• From Data Management to Actionable Findings: A Five-Phase Process of Qualitative Data Analysis
• A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research
• Adoption of agricultural conservation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature
• Stewards, Businessmen, and Heroes?: Role Conflict and Contradiction Among Row-Crop Farmers in an Age of Environmental Uncertainty
• Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature

Discussions

• Cover crops are often celebrated as a cornerstone of regenerative agriculture—but what happens when their use deepens farmers’ reliance on chemical herbicides for suppression/termination? Read the f [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]