2026/06/01 by Alexandra DeBusschere, Meaghan Lunney, Sonja Reid +15 · 1 voice
Psychology · Neuroscience · #Hearing Impairment and Communication #Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation #Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
paper · doi:10.1177/20543581261454470
openalex publication_date 2026/06/01 · openalex created_date 2026/06/13 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/18
Background: People with hearing loss may have difficulty communicating with health care providers if not properly supported. Hearing loss is common among people with kidney failure. Outpatient hemodialysis centers may present communication barriers due to noisy machines and overlapping conversations. Tools, such as assistive listening devices, exist to help people with hearing loss communicate. If and how they should be used in the outpatient hemodialysis setting is unclear. Understanding the patient perspective is an important first step before implementing such solutions. Objective: Describe the communication-related experiences of patients with hearing loss when conversing with health care providers during hemodialysis treatment, focusing on perceptions about communication tools. Design: Qualitative descriptive. Setting: Outpatient hemodialysis centers in Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Participants: Adults with kidney failure receiving maintenance hemodialysis with self-reported hearing loss. Methods: Semi-structured individual interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and abductively coded using a validated communication framework, a strategy to guide communication access in practice, and participants' experiences. Results: Fourteen patients participated between October 2023 and January 2024. Patient perceptions about communication tools varied. We identified three themes that describe these differences: (1) communication tools may be needed in transitional or clinically complex situations, (2) patients with their own resources may rely less on center-provided tools, and (3) awareness and self-advocacy for support varies across patients. Limitations: The major limitation of this study is the lack of representation from patients with language barriers and those belonging to the Deaf community or with overlooked hearing difficulties. Consequently, results may not be transferable to all patients with hearing loss in Alberta or elsewhere. Conclusions: Communication support needs are both person-specific and context-dependent, varying across and within patients. Not all patients that may benefit from communication tools will be comfortable asking or accepting help. Clinicians should routinely check in with patients about their communication needs and offer a variety of tools to accommodate as needed.