2026/05/01 by Michael H. H. Price, Allison M. Dennert, Gideon Mordecai +5 · 1 voice
Environmental Science · #Fish Ecology and Management Studies #Environmental Conservation and Management #Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
paper · doi:10.1111/con4.70068
openalex publication_date 2026/05/01 · openalex created_date 2026/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
ABSTRACT Conservation policies worldwide promise to halt biodiversity loss, yet implementation frequently lags intent. We examine this disconnect through wild Pacific salmon ( Oncorhynchus spp.) in Canada, where sustained declines have occurred despite the federal Wild Salmon Policy and legal protections available under the Species at Risk Act. Drawing on population data, policy analyses, and documented governance failures, we show that conservation outcomes have been compromised by declining monitoring capacity, weakened scientific integrity and independence, and limited political willingness to act on evidence. Long‐term monitoring has declined substantially, leaving many populations data‐deficient and delaying detection of risk. Scientific advice has at times been compromised by political and sectoral pressures that weaken evidence‐based decision‐making. Governments have repeatedly failed to implement timely protections for at‐risk populations despite clear scientific warnings. Together, these failures illustrate how discretionary governance and weak institutional safeguards can undermine conservation commitments. Canada's experience illustrates a broader global challenge: conservation policies lacking accountability mechanisms, enforceable obligations, and safeguards for scientific integrity are unlikely to deliver intended biodiversity outcomes. Preventing further loss will require sustained investment in monitoring and assessment, timely conservation action, and governance systems capable of translating scientific evidence into effective protection.