2024/08/20 by Maximilian L. Allen, Austin M. Green, Alexandra C. Avrin +1 · 1 voice
Environmental Science · Psychology · Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · #Wildlife Ecology and Conservation #Primate Behavior and Ecology #Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/1440-1703.12514
openalex publication_date 2024/08/20 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22
Abstract Intraspecific communication among carnivores can be complex and risky, and many solitary carnivores (including pumas; Puma concolor ) primarily communicate with potential mates and competitors indirectly via scent marking at communication hubs. We used multiple temporal analyses to understand if pumas of three classes (males, solo females, and females traveling with dependent kittens) varied in their temporal use of communication hubs to reduce risk while gathering information. We hypothesized that males would visit scrapes at typical times (nighttime), but that female behavioral strategies might vary based on whether they had dependent kittens or not. We found that pumas of different classes varied in their temporal patterns: male pumas concentrated their temporal activity at night (which is typical for pumas), solo females also tended to visit during the nighttime (although slightly earlier on average than males), while females with kittens were more active in the daytime. Our findings highlight the importance of communication hubs for intersexual communication in pumas and the flexibility that is inherent in puma behavioral ecology. Females adjusted their temporal behavior and visitation based on their reproductive status and life history stage, likely to assess dominant territorial males while also limiting their risk. Our study provides a mechanistic view of how communication through scent marking allows both long‐term and spatially separated communication to occur and that may allow pumas at different life stages with different risk tolerances to communicate with each other.