2026/05/01 by Eric M. Johnson, Eric W. Healy · 1 voice
Computer Science · Health Professions · Neuroscience · #Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation #Music and Audio Processing #Noise Effects and Management
paper · doi:10.1121/10.0043736
openalex publication_date 2026/05/01 · openalex created_date 2026/05/02 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
Environmental sound recognition (ESR) enables listeners to interpret complex acoustic environments, yet the frequency regions that support recognition are poorly understood. This study used deep learning to model ESR in competing speech and estimate frequency band-importance functions (BIFs) underlying recognition performance. Trial-level responses were collected from 46 listeners who identified 25 everyday sounds mixed with speech across a wide range of target-to-masker ratios. Two model variants were evaluated: one trained to mimic human performance, which was trained on soft labels derived from listener responses, and one trained for maximum accuracy, which was trained on ground-truth correct sound labels, enabling a direct comparison between perceptually driven and task-optimal band-importance patterns. The human-trained model closely reproduced key features of human performance, whereas the ground-truth-trained model exceeded human accuracy and showed highly reliable performance across cross-validation folds. BIFs were estimated by bandstop filtering the target signal and quantifying the resulting drop in recognition accuracy. Both model variants yielded reproducible BIFs with five prominent peaks (∼0.43, 0.77, 1.46, 2.6, and 9.7 kHz), largely driven by subsets of sounds having sharply tuned spectral dependence. This convergence across training objectives suggests that human performance closely reflects the task-optimal frequencies for segregating environmental sounds from speech maskers.