vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Fidelity of fricative measurements in remote data collection

2026/05/01 by Marina Oganyan, Emily P. Ahn, Gina-Anne Levow +3 · 1 voice
Medicine · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Linguistic Variation and Morphology #Phonetics and Phonology Research #Voice and Speech Disorders

paper · pdf · doi:10.1121/10.0043742

openalex publication_date 2026/05/01 · openalex created_date 2026/05/12 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/18

Abstract

This investigation explores whether differences between fricatives become compressed or shifted during remote recordings. Inputs for all test conditions (six devices across five teleconferencing platforms, two browsers, and internal and external microphones) were near-minimal English fricative-monophthong pairs read by a male speaker and female speaker. Differences of Mel frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), spectral measures, and loudness between /s/ and each of /f, ʃ, ʒ/ under each test condition were compared to the original. MFCCs often showed expanded differences; other measures often showed compression. Even reversals in differences were observed. The findings highlight the need to carefully select and document remote recording conditions for fricative measures.

Citations

Discussions

Related