On the relationship between democracy and terrorism

1995/12/01 by Todd Sandler · 1 voice · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence #Political Conflict and Governance #Religion and Society Interactions

paper · doi:10.1080/09546559508427315

openalex publication_date 1995/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29

Abstract

This article raises some methodological issues concerning the Eubank and Weinberg analysis of democracy and terrorism. A case is made for the use of events data rather than the presence of terrorist groups. Eubank and Weinberg's classification of countries, as having or not having terrorist groups, is questioned. Further details of their criteria of classification are requested. Some alternative tests are indicated, which can be done when data become available.

Cited by

• Is Islamist Terrorism More Dangerous?: An Empirical Study of Group Ideology, Organization, and Goal Structure

Discussions

• Todd Sandler critiques Eubank and Weinberg's classification of countries in democracy-terrorism studies, urging better methods. Emphasizes using events data over group presence for analysis. Calls for [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]

Related

• Democracy, Foreign Policy, and Terrorism
• How terrorism affects support for democracy
• The Ambivalent Effect of Autocratization on Domestic Terrorism
• What We Have Learned about Terrorism since 9/11
• The Causes of Terrorism