2026/05/01 by Han Thi Nguyen, Andrew James Codlin, Luan Nguyen Quang Vo +16 · 1 voice
Medicine · #Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology #Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis #Hematological disorders and diagnostics
paper · pdf · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2026.05.026
openalex publication_date 2026/05/01 · openalex created_date 2026/05/30 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31
OBJECTIVES: A pooled testing algorithm for tuberculosis (TB), in which sputum specimens from multiple individuals are tested in pools with individual testing of positive pools, can optimize diagnostic resources. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and cartridge savings of pooled testing with the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay (Xpert-Ultra) versus individual Xpert-Ultra testing. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 2396 adults (≥15 years) with presumptive TB enrolled between July 2024 and February 2025, through facility-based case finding (FBCF) and community-based case finding (CBCF). Participants submitted two sputum specimens. The first underwent individual Xpert-Ultra testing; remnant specimens were combined into 4-specimen pools (0.5 mL per specimen; total 2 mL) and retested using Xpert-Ultra. The second specimen was used to inoculate liquid culture (BACTEC MGIT). Data were used to simulate an upfront pooled testing strategy; sensitivity and specificity were estimated against culture, and cartridge use was compared with individual Xpert-Ultra testing. RESULTS: Of 2396 participants, 395 (16.5%) had a positive Xpert-Ultra and/or culture, including 360 of 912 (39.5%) in FBCF and 35 of 1484 (2.4%) in CBCF. The pooled testing approach had sensitivity of 82.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.9-86.3) and specificity of 98.5% (97.8-99.0) compared with culture, with lower sensitivity than individual Xpert-Ultra testing (86.5%, 82.4-89.9) but high specificity (98.1%, 97.4-98.7). Sensitivity of pooled testing was lower in CBCF (59.1%, 36.4-79.3) than in FBCF (84.0%, 79.5-87), whereas cartridge savings were greater in CBCF (69.1% vs. 9.6%). The pooling strategy reduced Xpert-Ultra cartridge use by 46.5%, saving USD 14 447. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled Xpert-Ultra testing among adults appears resource-efficient for TB screening in Vietnam. As sensitivity is lower than individual Xpert-Ultra testing, particularly for paucibacillary disease, these losses should be carefully weighed against gains in affordability and expanded access to molecular testing. Careful, context-specific implementation is essential to maximize programmatic benefit while minimizing missed persons with TB.