2026/01/01 by Kristen M. Rayfield, Siobhán B. Cooke, Alexis M. Mychajliw +4 · 1 voice
Agricultural and Biological Sciences · Earth and Planetary Sciences · Environmental Science · #Bat Biology and Ecology Studies #Evolution and Paleontology Studies #Species Distribution and Climate Change
paper · doi:10.1093/evolinnean/kzag014
openalex publication_date 2026/01/01 · openalex created_date 2026/06/16 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/25
Caribbean islands are hotspots of mammalian biodiversity and extinction where only a few intermediate-sized non-volant species survived. Despite numerous extirpations and extinctions, how body size (intrinsic trait) or island features (extrinsic environmental variables) contribute to the survival and extirpation of 479 Caribbean bat populations is poorly known. We used phylogenetic hierarchical models to impute missing body mass data for several fossil species and then to model extirpation probability as a function of intrinsic traits and extrinsic variables. We found smaller- and larger-sized bat species had higher rates of survival than intermediate-sized ones; elevation increased, island size decreased this curvilinear survival probability, and deforestation decreased overall survival. We propose that: (i) flight constrains body size such that bats are prey to introduced species but larger bats can better recolonize islands, yielding a pattern of greater survival at larger sizes, (ii) undersampling of bat populations on small islands and the diversity of introduced species on larger islands explains the interaction with island size, and (iii) deforestation reflects centuries of long-standing biotic reconstruction that transformed island landscapes. Our findings highlight the primacy of body mass and its interaction with extrinsic variables in explaining Caribbean bat extirpations with broader implications for island biogeography, evolution, and conservation.