2023/11/02 by David S. Meyer · 1 voice
Social Sciences · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Political Conflict and Governance #Populism, Right-Wing Movements
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/socf.12949
openalex publication_date 2023/11/02 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/25
Social movements must find ways to intensify their efforts to maintain political relevance—and potential influence. But escalation comes with risks in the potential reactions from authorities, supporters, potential supporters, and opponents. I argue that recognizing two elements of escalation can help. First, we need to acknowledge that movements are not unitary actors and that a large movement cannot always stop putative allies from escalating in risky ways. Second, I argue that scholars and activists can do better in making sense of the dynamics of escalation by disaggregating three dimensions of aggression by tactics, claims, and venues, assessing the range of responses to escalation on each of these dimensions. Social movement organizers face continual pressure to find ways to escalate, but responses from authorities and allies can provide a brake on escalation. I illustrate my arguments with reference to contemporary movements of the left and right in the United States and conclude by discussing the importance (and danger) of certain government responses.