2023/09/08 by Colin Chamberlain · 1 voice
Arts and Humanities · #Historical Philosophy and Science #Philosophy and History of Science #Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
paper · pdf · doi:10.3998/phimp.2503
openalex publication_date 2023/09/08 · openalex created_date 2023/09/09 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
Sometimes we love and hate the same thing at the same time. Margaret Cavendish (1623–1673) appeals to this type of passionate conflict to argue that the mind is a material thing. When our passions conflict, the mind or reason conflicts with itself. From this, Cavendish infers that the mind has parts and, therefore, is material. Cavendish says that this argument is among the best proofs of the mind’s materiality. And yet, the existing scholarship on Cavendish lacks the kind of detailed reconstruction required to evaluate the merits of this argument. In this paper, I provide just such a reconstruction. I also show that Cavendish’s argument is an effective intervention in her dispute with René Descartes and Henry More about the materiality of the mind.