2022/05/31 by Katrin Gerber, Barbara Hayes, Melissa J. Bloomer +5 · 1 voice
Medicine · Health Professions · #Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues #Frailty in Older Adults #Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
paper · pdf · doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.05.004
openalex publication_date 2022/05/31 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
BACKGROUND: Predicting older patients' life expectancy is an important yet challenging task. Hospital aged care assessment teams advise treating teams on older patients' type and place of care, directly affecting quality of care. Yet, little is known about their experiences with prognostication. METHODS: Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven geriatricians/ registrars, ten nurses and three allied health staff from aged care assessment teams across two hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: To generate prognoses, clinicians used analytical thinking, intuition, assessments from others, and pattern matching. Prognostic tools were an underutilised resource. Barriers to recognition of dying included: diffusion of responsibility regarding whose role it is to identify patients at end-of-life; lack of feedback about whether a prognosis was correct; system pressures to pursue active treatment and vacate beds; avoidance of end-of-life discussions; lack of confidence, knowledge and training in prognostication and pandemic-related challenges.