2025/01/21 by Zhenling Wang, Kevin Ikeda, Hengyuan Shen +5 · 1 voice · 1 citation
Physics and Astronomy · Chemistry · #Advanced Chemical Physics Studies #Crystallography and molecular interactions #Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
paper · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01301
openalex publication_date 2025/01/21 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Energy decomposition analysis (EDA) based on density functional theory (DFT) and self-consistent field (SCF) calculations has become widely used for understanding intermolecular interactions. This work reports a new approach to EDA for post-SCF wave functions based on closed-shell restricted second-order Mo̷ller-Plesset (MP2) together with an efficient implementation that generalizes the successful SCF-level second-generation absolutely localized molecular orbital EDA approach, ALMO-EDA-II, and improves upon MP2 ALMO-EDA-I. The new MP2 ALMO-EDA-II provides distinct energy contributions for a frozen interaction energy containing permanent electrostatics and Pauli repulsions, polarized energy-yielding induced electrostatics, dispersion-corrected energy, and the fully relaxed energy, which describes charge transfer. All terms have useful complete basis set limits due to the design of the theory, corroborated by a range of test calculations on model systems, and the S22 and the Ionic43 data sets of weak and strong intermolecular interactions, respectively. Comparisons with the DFT-based ALMO-EDA-II suggest that the new MP2 EDA yields quite a consistent interpretation of intermolecular interactions when the total interaction energies are consistent. To begin to address the limitations of the MP2 theory itself, the MP2 ALMO-EDA-II was also implemented for κ-regularized MP2 and the size-consistent second-order Brillouin-Wigner (BW-s2) method, both of which are more accurate for dispersion-dominated interactions. The principal limitation of MP2 ALMO-EDA-II is associated with the need to obtain orthogonal fragment-localized virtual orbitals, which leads to clearly poorer results when using atomic orbital basis sets that contain diffuse functions. We therefore recommend using nonaugmented basis sets.