Truth-bearers and the Liar - a reply to Alan Weir

2001/04/01 by L. Goldstein · 1 citation
Arts and Humanities · Psychology · #Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics #Theology and Philosophy of Evil #Philosophy and Theoretical Science

paper · doi:10.1093/analys/61.2.115

Abstract

Journal Article Truth-bearers and the Liar – a reply to Alan Weir Get access Laurence Goldstein Laurence Goldstein University of Glasgow65–69 Oakfield Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK [email protected] Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Analysis, Volume 61, Issue 2, April 2001, Pages 115–126, https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/61.2.115 Published: 01 April 2001

Cited by

• Malfunctionalism and the Liar Paradox: Bad Expressions of Good Content

Related

• Rejoinder to Laurence Goldstein on the Liar
• Token relativism and the Liar
• A neglected deflationist approach to the liar
• Recalcitrant variants of the liar paradox
• Fugitive truth