Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences

2014/12/01 by John D. Bowman · 1 voice · 3 citations
Decision Sciences · #Academic Publishing and Open Access #scientometrics and bibliometrics research

paper · pdf · doi:10.5688/ajpe7810176

crossref issued 2014/12/01 · crossref published 2014/12/01 · crossref published-print 2014/12/01 · openalex publication_date 2014/12/01 · crossref created 2015/01/28 · crossref deposited 2025/09/12 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref indexed 2026/04/25 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/25

Cited by

• Inequity, precarity, and disparity: Exploring systemic and institutional barriers in open access publishing
• Genuine versus bogus scientific controversies: the case of statins
• Journals Operating Predatory Practices Are Systematically Eroding the Science Ethos: A Gate and Code Strategy to Minimise Their Operating Space and Restore Research Best Practice

Discussions

• They emerged around the same time as "predatory" journals, but attracted less attention. Here's an article from 2014: doi.org/10.5688/ajpe... [bsky, 1 points, 2 comments]