2004/08/25 by Charles L. Bosk, Raymond G. De Vries, Raymond De Vries · 4 citations
Medicine · Social Sciences · Health Professions · #Ethics in Clinical Research #Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics #Ethics in medical practice
paper · doi:10.1177/0002716204266913
Ethnographers have long been unhappy with the review of their research proposals by institutional review boards (IRBs). In this article, we offer a sociological view of the problems associated with prospective IRB review of ethnographic research. Compared with researchers in other fields, social scientists have been less willing to accommodate themselves to IRB oversight; we identify the reasons for this reluctance, and in an effort to promote such accommodation, we suggest several steps to reduce the frustration associated with IRB review of ethnographic research. We conclude by encouraging ethnographers to be alert to the ways the procedural and bureaucratic demands of IRBs can displace their efforts to solve the serious ethical dilemmas posed by ethnography.