Globalising Chinese Actors and Internalising the Belt and Road: Implications for Global and Domestic Governance

2025/01/01 by Miwa Hirono · 1 voice
Social Sciences · #International Development and Aid

paper · pdf · doi:10.22459/gcaibr.2025

openalex publication_date 2025/01/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/03/21

Abstract

The literature on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) points out either its negative or positive impacts on global and domestic governance. However, such a dichotomy is too simplistic, not least because it tells us little about the complexity of change in the nature of the BRI as it is implemented.

Discussions

• Our upcoming title offers a fresh look at the #BRI by focusing on local and Chinese perspectives, not just strategy. It also highlights Japan’s key role in global aid, challenging the usual BRI narrat [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]

Related

• Understanding China’s ‘Belt and Road Initiative’: beyond ‘grand strategy’ to a state transformation analysis
• Mutual legitimation attempts: the United Nations and China's Belt and Road Initiative
• Adaptive Governance at Work: How Chinese State Actors Respond to Overseas Pushback on the Belt and Road Initiative
• The Belt and Road Initiative: geo-economics and Indo-Pacific security competition
• Defining the Belt and Road: How Ideas and Interests Shaped Argentina’s Approach to the Initiative