2025/06/21 by Marcus Belke, Felix Zahnert, Mirja Steinbrenner +12 · 1 voice
Medicine · Neuroscience · #EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces #Epilepsy research and treatment #Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/epi.18514
openalex publication_date 2025/06/21 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to develop and validate an automatic, artificial intelligence-enhanced software tool for hippocampal sclerosis (HS) detection, using a variety of standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols from different MRI scanners for routine clinical practice. METHODS: First, MRI scans of 36 epilepsy patients with unilateral HS and 36 control patients with epilepsy of other etiologies were analyzed. MRI features, including hippocampal subfield volumes from three-dimensional (3D) magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) scans and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) intensities, were calculated. Hippocampal subfield volumes were corrected for total brain volume and z-scored using a dataset of 256 healthy controls. Hippocampal subfield FLAIR intensities were z-scored in relation to each subject's mean cortical FLAIR signal. Additionally, left-right ratios of FLAIR intensities and volume features were obtained. Support vector classifiers were trained on the above features to predict HS presence and laterality. In a second step, the algorithm was validated using two independent, external cohorts, including 118 patients and 116 controls in sum, scanned with different MRI scanners and acquisition protocols. RESULTS: Classifiers demonstrated high accuracy in HS detection and lateralization, with slight variations depending on the input image availability. The best cross-validation accuracy was achieved using both 3D MPRAGE and 3D FLAIR scans (mean accuracy = 1.0, confidence interval [CI] = .939-1.0). External validation of trained classifiers in two independent cohorts yielded accuracies of .951 (CI = .902-.980) and .889 (CI = .805-.945), respectively. In both validation cohorts, the additional use of FLAIR scans led to significantly better classification performance than the use of MPRAGE data alone (p = .016 and p = .031, respectively). A further model was trained on both validation cohorts and tested on the former training cohort, providing additional evidence for good validation performance. Comparison to a previously published algorithm showed no significant difference in performance (p = 1). SIGNIFICANCE: The method presented achieves accurate automated HS detection using standard clinical MRI protocols. It is robust and flexible and requires no image processing expertise.