2024/01/02 by Zoheir Bagheri Noaparast, David Maldwyn Ellis · 1 voice
Arts and Humanities · #Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications #Karl Barth and Christian Theology #Religion, Theology, and Education
paper · pdf · doi:10.1080/05568641.2025.2537625
openalex publication_date 2024/01/02 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/13
Some philosophers of religion are attracted to Wittgenstein’s claim of approaching religion in a descriptive and non-revisionary manner because they desire greater plurality and diversity of religions in their study. However, Wittgenstein’s account of religious beliefs as never based on evidence (i.e., non-evidentialism) and rituals as never performed as a means to an end (i.e., non-instrumentalism) results in a prescriptive conception of religion that impedes the plurality and diversity of religions apt for study. Moreover, since he thinks scientific beliefs are evidential and scientific practices are instrumental, he effectively dichotomizes religion from science. After demonstrating this, we counter that: (i) many religious beliefs are based on evidence; (ii) many religious practices are means to an end; (iii) not every society that has a religion separates it from science; (iv) Wittgenstein’s approach gaslights many religious believers.