2025/07/03 by Kylie Moore‐Gilbert · 1 voice · 2 citations
Social Sciences · #International Law and Aviation #International Law and Human Rights #Military and Defense Studies
paper · pdf · doi:10.1080/10361146.2025.2542736
openalex publication_date 2025/07/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
When an Australian citizen is wrongfully or arbitrarily detained abroad the response they should expect from their government at a consular, political and diplomatic level is often unclear. Efforts at case management and ultimately, resolution, are further complicated by an absence of specific criteria for identifying wrongful or arbitrary detentions, and an operational environment in which resource allocation and the extent of diplomatic intervention appear to be determined on an ad hoc basis. The distinctiveness of each case and a general paucity of publicly available data render attempts to evaluate the effectiveness of Australia’s management of wrongful and arbitrary detention cases challenging. Drawing on evidence and testimony presented to a 2024 Senate Inquiry into the wrongful detention of Australians overseas, this article adapts an evaluation framework developed by Tindall and Hart to measure governments’ responsiveness to large-scale overseas consular emergencies to the management of wrongful and arbitrary detention cases.