The Partisan Brain
2015/02/08 by Erik C. Nisbet, Kathryn E. Cooper, R. Kelly Garrett +1 · 50 citations
Social Sciences · #Climate Change Communication and Perception #Social and Intergroup Psychology #Social Media and Politics
paper · doi:10.1177/0002716214555474
Abstract
There has been deepening concern about political polarization in public attitudes toward the scientific community. The “intrinsic thesis” attributes this polarization to psychological deficiencies among conservatives as compared to liberals. The “contextual thesis” makes no such claims about inherent psychological differences between conservatives and liberals, but rather points to interacting institutional and psychological factors as the forces driving polarization. We evaluate the evidence for both theses in the context of developing and testing a theoretical model of audience response to dissonant science communication. Conducting a national online experiment ( N = 1,500), we examined audience reactions to both conservative-dissonant and liberal-dissonant science messages and consequences for trust in the scientific community. Our results suggest liberals and conservatives alike react negatively to dissonant science communication, resulting in diminished trust of the scientific community. We discuss how our findings link to the larger debate about political polarization of science and implications for science communicators.
Citations
Cited by
- Politically Knowledgeable or Directional (Mis)Believers? How to Identify Those Who Are correct About Political Facts for the “Wrong” Reasons
- A four-level model of political polarization over science: Evidence from 10 European countries
- Political ideology and trust in scientists in the USA
- Explaining Polarized Trust in Scientists: A Political Stereotype-Approach
- Advances in transparency and reproducibility in the social sciences
- Trust in climate scientists is associated with political ideology: A 26-country analysis
- Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology
- The Political Influence of Lifestyle Influencers? Examining the Relationship Between Aspirational Social Media Use and Anti-Expert Attitudes and Beliefs
- “You can’t challenge the narrative”: Conservative-leaning New Zealanders on power, truth and politics in science
- Rapidly diverging public trust in science in the United States
- The Honest Broker versus the Epistocrat: Attenuating Distrust in Science by Disentangling Science from Politics
- No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology
- Who is at risk of bias? Examining dispositional differences in motivated science reception
- Asymmetry of Partisan Media Effects?: Examining the Reinforcing Process of Conservative and Liberal Media with Political Beliefs
- The nature and origins of political polarization over science
- Salience, Scientific Uncertainty, and the Agenda‐Setting Power of Science
- When Scientists Share Their Struggles: How Scientists’ Self-Presentation on Social Media Influences Public Perceptions, Support for Science, and Information-Seeking Intentions
- Patterns of belief and trust in climate change information
- In Dice We Trust: Uncertainty Displays for Maintaining Trust in Election Forecasts Over Time
- Misconceptions, Misinformation, and the Logic of Identity-Protective Cognition
- Tweeting From Left to Right
- Swaying the Public? Impacts of Election Forecast Visualizations on Emotion, Trust, and Intention in the 2022 U.S. Midterms
- The potential role of actively open-minded thinking in preventing motivated reasoning about controversial science
- The News You Choose: news media preferences amplify views on climate change
- Fallibility Salience Increases Intellectual Humility: Implications for People’s Willingness to Investigate Political Misinformation
- Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon. [europepmc]
- Finding the traces of behavioral and cognitive processes in big data and naturally occurring datasets. [europepmc]
- Controversy matters: Impacts of topic and solution controversy on the perceived credibility of a scientist who advocates. [europepmc]
- Scientific risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions of scientists' political orientations and credibility. [europepmc]
- Does truth matter to voters? The effects of correcting political misinformation in an Australian sample. [europepmc]
- Understanding climate change from a global analysis of city analogues. [europepmc]
- Do Counter-Narratives Reduce Support for ISIS? Yes, but Not for Their Target Audience. [europepmc]
- Closed-minded cognition: Right-wing authoritarianism is negatively related to belief updating following prediction error. [europepmc]
- Partisan public health: how does political ideology influence support for COVID-19 related misinformation? [europepmc]
- The ideological divide in confidence in science and participation in medical research. [europepmc]
- The role of ideological attitudes in responses to COVID-19 threat and government restrictions in Australia. [europepmc]
- Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample. [europepmc]
- What factors underlie attitudes regarding protective mask use during the COVID-19 pandemic? [europepmc]
- Policy liberalism and source of news predict pandemic-related health behaviors and trust in the scientific community. [europepmc]
- The shot, the message, and the messenger: COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Latin America. [europepmc]
- Scientists, presidents, and pandemics-comparing the science-politics nexus during the Zika virus and COVID-19 outbreaks. [europepmc]
- Trust in scientific information mediates associations between conservatism and coronavirus responses in the U.S., but few other nations. [europepmc]
- The Role of Graduate Medical Education in the Fight Against Health Misinformation. [europepmc]
- Designing persuasive health education for patients seeking unproven stem cell interventions. [europepmc]
- Non-monetary narratives motivate businesses to engage with climate change. [europepmc]
- Trumpism, climate and COVID: Social bases of the new science rejection. [europepmc]
- In-party love spreads more efficiently than out-party hate in online communities. [europepmc]
- Does personal relevance moderate communication effects? The example of risk communication about 5G-related electromagnetic fields. [europepmc]
- The Role of Ideological Attitudes in Responses to COVID-19 Threat and Government Restrictions in Australia [europepmc]
- Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Nationwide Lockdown on Trust, Attitudes towards Government, and Wellbeing [europepmc]
Related