Framing climate remedies in European human rights law: It is all about trust – in European democracies

2025/11/11 by Başak Çalı · 1 voice
Environmental Science · Social Sciences · #Climate Change and Geoengineering #Environmental Policies and Emissions #Environmental law and policy

paper · pdf · doi:10.1080/13642987.2025.2573800

openalex created_date 2025/11/11 · openalex publication_date 2025/11/11 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/15

Abstract

This article examine show frame analysis contributes to the analysis of remedies in the three seminal climate rulings of the European Court of Human Rights. It argues that the Courth as actively shaped human rights-based climate remedies through the frame of ‘democratic trust’. This frame places democratic institutions of European states, notably, governments, parliaments courts and civil society, at the heart of securing climate remedies, whilst marginalising two counter-frames, the ‘climate justice frame’ calling for remedies to align with European states’ fair share contributions to climate change and the ‘climate urgency frame’ requiring clear deadlines for action. The democratic trust frame has important doctrinal consequences. Whilst it diagnoses climate change as a human rights problem, it strengthens the presumption of deference to national actors insolving this problem and places significant expectations on successful political and legal mobilisation of civil society in securing effective climate action. The analysis advanced in the article demonstrates the utility of frame analysis in unearthing how key ideas are mobilised and disregarded in the making of solution and motivational frames in court judgments and how legal doctrine is shaped by framing effects.

Citations

• THE TYRANNY OF SMALL DECISIONS: MARKET FAILURES, IMPERFECTIONS, AND THE LIMITS OF ECONOMICS*

Discussions

• Başak Çalı on the ECtHR's 2024 climate rulings: whilst diagnosing #climatechange as a #humanrights problem, the Court placed solutions back with national democracies through a "democratic frame of tru [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]

Related

• A Landmark Climate Decision: Verein Klimaseniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland and the New Standard for Victim Status
• On the climate justice front: Co-producing prefigurative politics in ‘Ecodefence! and others vs. Russia’ climate case in the European Court of Human Rights
• Climate litigation before the European Court of Human Rights: some observations on the case Klimaseniorinnen and Others v Switzerland
• Separation of Powers and Climate Litigation: International Law as a Guide Between Judicial Activism and Legislative Prerogatives
• Climate Justice through International Courts and Tribunals: Advisory Opinions in the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ)