2026/02/18 by J. Westerink, Jeanne L. Nel, R.I. van Dam +11 · 1 voice
Environmental Science · #Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education #Species Distribution and Climate Change #Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
paper · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2026.101617
openalex publication_date 2026/02/18 · openalex created_date 2026/02/19 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/26
Social networks of actors and networks of networks are essential in transformative change for biodiversity. In particular, cross-boundary networks such as science–policy–society interface networks are relevant for exchanging ideas that may shift values, paradigms, knowledge, policies, and practices. On the basis of literature and a collaborative design process, we develop three pathways for social networks to navigate in advancing their transformative aspirations: ‘collaborate’, ‘challenge’, and ‘disrupt’. The ‘collaborate’ pathway operates within existing systems, working with ‘coalitions of the willing’. The ‘challenge’ pathway criticises the politics of unsustainable and inequitable practices and calls on powerful actors to take responsibility. The ‘disrupt’ pathway is aimed at removing elements of the current system that hinder transformative change for biodiversity. We suggest that the transformative potential of networks depends on their ability to navigate between the pathways. Networks of networks provide opportunities for networks to combine pathways and leverage each other’s capacities. • Social networks are potential levers of transformative change for biodiversity. • Boundary crossing networks at the science–policy–society interface are needed. • Transformative potential of networks refers to outcome as well as process . • Transformative networks navigate the pathways collaborate , challenge , and disrupt . • Networks of networks help combine pathways and leverage each other’s capacities.